data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5a8d/c5a8df5f428a03712c552691a5cfd8440d3d789f" alt=""
I am not going to question the validity, the relationship, the benefits financial or otherwise or the lack thereof of the 50% join ownership that has existed between the Town and Powerstream since the 2012 sale. The details of the agreement are seemingly known to only a few anything else is pure speculation. I will however weigh in on what I would be considering during the decision making process to sell the remaining 50% if I was sitting at the Council table.
As of this writing there are 70 power distributions companies across the Province of Ontario with Collus being one of them. To me that seems like a lot of players and I know it was part of the consideration that was given when the first 50% sale of Collus was being contemplated. Having choice is a good thing. It typically implies there is competition and competition for the most part is good. At the same time too many of anything often leads to redundancies and inefficiencies resulting in potentially higher costs unless there is a clear, well defined and well executed value proposition. Since the 2012 sale to Powerstream for 50% of Collus, Powerstrteam itself has purchased Hydro One Brampton from the Province. Following that acquisition Powerstream then merged with two other electrical providers Enersource and Horizon Utilities in February 2017 to create a new company Alectra, touted as "second largest municipally-owned electric utility by customer base in North America, second only to the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power." Tell me there are not efficiencies and other improvements to be had here which can be of benefit to consumers. Consolidation is happening in virtually every business that I know of including mine, real estate.
The other consideration which no one has even remotely mentioned with respect to this transaction and the future is that of technology and I am referring to the disruptive type. In the past 10 to 15 years look at the industries that have fallen victim to sweeping changes in technologies. Kodak ignored digital photography until it was virtually too late. Consider the changes that have taken place in the music industry, followed by books and others. Today the entire retail landscape is undergoing rampant change with 25% of mall space in North America expected to be vacant by 2020 all due to technology and consumer's buying/consumption habits. Are we to believe that the electrical distribution business is immune to such change and impact? Think again. If I were a member of Collingwood Council the question I would be asking myself is this. Is it wise to be in the conventional electrical distribution business long term erecting hydro poles and stringing wires or is it too going to be adversely impacted by technological change? Notwithstanding nuclear power plants, the production and transmission of electricity is pretty old school. Coal powered generating plants, wooden poles in the ground and wires strung everywhere. In Puerto Rico their main electrical generating plant is run on bunker oil. Not very high tech in my books.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f911/7f911eab2c3a9c0d3906788afb19a70d906340f8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b18e2/b18e2bc684bf6a83f3df12a20f132a377d351db0" alt=""
Those that choose to rant and rave about the Town's decision to sell the reaming 50% of Collus often do so based on emotion and or out of fear that our hydro bills will rise even further. This however is a business decision and one that needs to be made based on not what dividend payments have or haven't been over the past five years but rather what will the next five means for this company and others like it.